My CPU's idling temp ~40CĬPU: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X CPU Cooler: Cryorig H7 OS: Windows 10 Pro 圆4 (v.2004) MB: Asus ROG Strix X570-F (BIOS 2812 BETA) RAM: 32 GB G Skill Flare-X 3200 MHz CL14 (4X8GB) PSU: Seasonic Focus GX 750 80+ Gold GPU: Asus GTX 1060 Strix 6GB OCĭud CPU (silicon lottery lemon) - but temp were OK and cores are capable of 4.65GHz Asus MB BETA BIOS 3200MHz RAM vs 3600MHz RAM - but I was under the impression that impact was only slight, if any High ambient temp (27C) - CPU temp was still below 70C I have some background apps running (just antivirus and HWInfo)Īny insights would be appreciated. OS: Windows 10 Pro 圆4 (v.2004) MB: Asus ROG Strix X570-F (BIOS 2812 BETA) RAM: 32 GB G Skill Flare-X 3200 MHz CL14 (4X8GB) PSU: Seasonic Focus GX 750 80+ Gold. Anyway at 4 GHz the 1950X spat out an incredible score of 3408 pts in Cinebench though due to the way XFR works this overclock actually slightly reduced the single thread performance. Again, this is a pretty convincing victory - 1.5x single. During the benchmark runs, CPU temp did not exceed 70C (max 68.6C), but frequency only hovered at around 4.075GHz (though all 6 cores are able to achieve 4.65GHz max). My PC configurations are: CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X. Remember that the M1 Max has 8 high performance and 2 efficiency cores vs. Cela inclut de nouvelles instructions AVX, mises en uvre grâce à la technologie Intel Embree, disponible. I was wondering why my Multi-Core score was significantly below average. Cinebench R20 implémente de nouvelles fonctionnalités disponibles pour les processeurs x86. I have left all settings at default/stock (ie no Auto-OC or PBO etc) But most impressively, the Core i9-12900HK is the first mobile CPU to out-right beat Cinebench R20's reference Ryzen Threadripper 1950X score of 6,670 points (which you can find by installing the. Single Core: 588 (consistent with others' benchmarks) Multi-Core: 4055 (about 10% worse than others' benchmarks) Whereas the Intel CPU pushed total system consumption to 388 watts, the 1950X hit 358 watts, an 8% reduction for what was often between 20 - 30% more performance.Due to my inexperience with the benchmarking software, I would like some insight/clarification of my Cinebench R20 results for my Ryzen 5 5600X: It has 16 cores and 32 threads, and is based on 14 nm manufacturing technology, with a max turbo frequency of 4000 MHz and an unlocked multiplier. Based on Zen architecture, this desktop processor is primarily aimed at home systems. Overclocking performance in Warhammer was tested using Uniform Memory Access and here the overclocks did little to boost performance.įinally we have the overclocking power consumption figures and here Threadripper looks quite good, especially in relation to the Core i7-7900X. AMD started AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X sales 10 August 2017 at a recommended price of 999. This meant when testing with Premiere Pro CC the 1920X did trail the Core i9-7900X while the 1950X was quite a lot faster. This meant both overclocked Threadripper parts were much faster than the overclocked 7900X.īack to the kind of margins seen in Blender we find that while the 1950X was 9% faster overclocked the 1920X was just 5% faster. Interestingly this time when testing with Corona the 1920X saw a massive 17% performance improvement when overclocked while the 1950X was just 7% faster. Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: None: Gaming HW Bench recommends AMD Ryzen 9 5950X. Specifications Mfr Part Number: YD195XA8AEWOF model: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950x Core count: 16 thread count: 32 Frequency: 3.4 GHz max Turbo Frequency: 4.0 GHz l1 Cache: 1.5 MB l2 Cache: 8 MB l3 Cache: 32 MB unlocked: Yes CMOS technology: &NBSP 14nm package: STR4 PCI Express version:&NBSP PCIe 3.0 default TDP/ TDP: 180 W memory: Max speed. This means even overclocked the Core i9-7900X wasn't much faster than the 1920X and wasn't able to match the stock 1950X in this application. Neuer Cinebench R20 im Test mit AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16x 3.40GHz und Betriebssystem Windows 10 Version 1809Das verbesserte Cinebench Release 20 (alt. ![]() Overclocked the Blender render time for the 1950X was cut down by an impressive 11% while the 1920X time was reduced by 6%. With the clock speeds of 3.4 GHz base and 4 GHz Turbo, this is. ![]() You could probably fine tune the overclock to avoid this but with time against us we didn't play around with the overclocking too much. From what we do know, 16 Zen cores at 999 is about the ballpark price we were expecting. Extreme voltages might see you hit 4.1 - 4.2 GHz like what we've seen with some Ryzen CPUs but for 24/7 usage 4 GHz looks to be the limit.Īnyway at 4 GHz the 1950X spat out an incredible score of 3408 pts in Cinebench though due to the way XFR works this overclock actually slightly reduced the single thread performance. As expected the Threadripper CPUs were able to hit 4 GHz but unfortunately like Ryzen 7 weren't able to go beyond that point.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |